The results has been very pleasing so far; we've seen an increase in visits to the site (although some of this can be attributed to the general growth that 'word-of-mouth' brings) and certainly an increase in the debate following on from articles. We have heavily indulged sarcasm, irony and attempted satire alongside more traditional reports, and have unsurprisingly seen preference for the humour.
What this seems to suggest is that contrary to previous opinion (a particular debacle involving a satirical article that prevented publication for months springs to mind...), when done properly, satire and sarcasm are well within the reaches of secondary school students. Exploring this capacity would be something that I would be very interested in following, as it seems a perfect method for engaging those who would not initially class themselves as 'political'. It is our view at INK that everyone has the capacity for political debate; that it simply needs to be exposed.
Incidentally, this theory of politicising young people was explored to interesting ends as part of the recent Channel 4 series, "Jamie's Dream School" (http://www.youtube.com/user/DreamSchool#p/u/63/kEaNWicETkA).
How about doing some video interviews with a range of different students to ask political questions, which you can take to a local politician and pose. A kind of Junior Question Time!
ReplyDelete